WiredBerries
The Daily Network for healthy living

A Deep Dark Secret About Chocolate

by WiredBerries Editors — August 20, 2007

Chocolate is arguably one of life’s sweetest gifts, but there are mixed reviews on whether it’s actually good for you, and whether it should be considered a "health food." So, assuming that the right kind is eaten moderately, does chocolate offer some important health benefits or did candy companies make it all up to boost sales?

"There are some unique health benefits in chocolate," confirms Dr. David Katz, a nutrition expert with the Yale School of Medicine, which he says include an array of antioxidants that have been shown to give some protection against cancer. In fact, cocoa has more flavanoids—an important antioxidant—than green tea. "It's probably the richest source of flavanoids in our diet," says Katz.

But here’s where it gets complicated: Cocoa butter is quite pricey, so less expensive brands usually replace the cocoa butter with milk fats and hydrogenated oils, which are bad for you and dilute the cocoa content to where there’s no longer any benefit. Often even chocolate that is labeled as "dark" actually contains milk.

Mauro Serafini, PhD, of Italy’s National Institute for Food and Nutrition Research in Rome says that if you eat chocolate for your health, you should stick with just true dark chocolate without milk or milk fats in the ingredients. Serafini also points out why we shouldn’t eat some dark and some milk chocolate together and expect the same benefit. It’s all or nothing! "Our findings indicate that milk may interfere with the absorption of antioxidants from chocolate...and may therefore negate the potential health benefits that can be derived from eating moderate amounts of dark chocolate."

But for those of us that already love dark chocolate—we’re in luck! The darker the chocolate, the more antioxidants it contains, and the bigger the health-boost.

What people are saying...

Glad to know about the flavanoids..but isn't chocolate full of sugar and fat?

Posted by: Judy Van Ingen | August 20, 2007 12:05 PM

In fact, fat comprises 35% of chocolate content, while the other 70% is just sugar.

However, it is the unique crystallization interplay of the sugar combined with the fat in our digestive system that allow the flavinoids to exist.

So, yes, chocolate is "full of sugar and fat."
I'm glad to know that at least someone around here has the SIMPLE, CORRECT view of the issue.

Like Occam's razor, the simpler the answer, the better. Incidentally, such answers are easier to remember, and make great slogans.

Posted by: Nathan B. | August 21, 2007 5:35 AM

I agree about brevity. For instance, grease, ketchup and salt is another short summary of food most Americans crave!

Posted by: Judy Van Ingen | August 22, 2007 12:48 PM

I don't know where Nathan B gets his information, but since dark chocolate usually has 70% or greater cocoa content, then it's definitely not 70% sugar. Do the math.

Judy Van Ingen's comment makes more sense. Yes there is some fat and sugar in chocolate. I think when people call it a 'health food' they mean it's a healthy desert or treat alternative to other sweets. A piece of regular cake, for example, has lots of calories but little nutritional value--whereas a chunk of dark chocolate compensates for it's calories by brimming with antioxidants. Even so, it should be eaten sparingly as a 'healthy treat' and not as a replacement for whole grains and fresh produce.

Posted by: chocolate lover | August 23, 2007 10:48 AM
Comment on this Post

Thank you for joining the conversation! Please note that all comments are screened for approval by the WiredBerries staff prior to posting.


Join our healthy living network! Contact Us | About Us | Advertise | Privacy | TOS | Copyright
Presented by Realtime Publishers